![]() |
James E. Mountain, Jr.
Shareholder Portland: (503) 242-0000 - Toll Free: (800) 315-4172
Administrative,
Appellate,
Government |
|||
| Representative Engagements Notable Appeals Logan v. D.W. Sivers Co., 343 Or 339, 169 P3d 1255 (2007), 207 Or App 231, 141 P3d 589 (2006). On appeal to the Oregon Court of Appeals and on review by the Oregon Supreme Court the appellate courts recognized that a temporary exclusive dealing provision in an otherwise unenforceable letter of intent to purchase and sell commercial property stated a contractual promise that was breached by a sale of the property to a third party during the term of the exclusive dealing provision. Williams-Branch v. Philip Morris, 340 Or 35, 127 P3d 1165 (2006). On remand from United States Supreme Court in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Williams, 124 S Ct 59 (Mem) (2003), a summary reversal of judgment for $79.5 million in punitive damages. Mims v. City of Eugene, 2005 WL 1865555 (9th Cir. 2005). On appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the court confirmed reasonableness of City’s riot control measures. Nobl Park, LLC of Vancouver v. Shell Oil Co., 122 Wash App 838, 95 P3d 1265 (2004), rev den, 154 Wash 2d 1027, 120 P3d 577 (2005). Represented construction company in successfully persuading Washington Supreme Court to let stand a Washington Court of Appeals decision to exclude economic damages in a construction defect claim from coverage under the Washington Products Liability Act. Permapost Products Co. v. Osmose Wood Preserving, Inc., 200 Or App 699, 116 P3d 909 (2005). Successfully defended manufacturer on appeal in products liability case applying the statute of limitations on an action for breach of an express warranty. Kaib's Roving R.Ph. Agency v. Employment Dept., 338 Or 433, 111 P3d 739 (2005). On review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled that under the Administrative Procedures Act, a reviewing court shall allow a business its attorney fees and costs if the court finds that a state agency "acted without a reasonable basis in fact or in law;" and contrary to the Court of Appeals' reading, the APA goes beyond merely allowing a court discretion to award fees but, instead, requires the court to award fees under the circumstances described. State of Oregon v. Bradly Morris Cunningham, Sr., (337 Or 528. 99 P3d 271 (2004). Leahy v. City of Gladstone, 52 Fed Appx 10 (9th Cir 2002). Federal Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, May 2002. Obtained order vacating large money judgment against client city for alleged taking of property without due process and just compensation. Bocci v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 158 Or App 521, 974 P.2d 758 (1999). Settled on remand from United States Supreme Court in Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Edwards, 123 S.C. 1781 (April 21, 2003), a summary reversal of treating physician’s judgment against pharmaceutical manufacturer for $22.5 million in punitive damages. Haupt v. Dillard, 17 F.3d 285 (9th Cir. 1994). Obtained reinstatement by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of civil claim for damages for criminal defendant who had been acquitted of murder charges after having been deprived of a fair trial. Black v. Dept. of Human Resources, 301 Or 221, 721 P.2d 451 (1986) and Smith v. Dept. of Human Resources, 302 Or 209, 721 P.2d 445 (1986). Argued that neither the state Constitution nor federal Constitution religious guarantees required the payment of unemployment insurance benefits to an employee terminated for engaging in religious activity that was illegal under state criminal law; a holding that was affirmed by the United States Supreme Court in Employment Division v. Smith, 494 US 872 (1990). Salem College & Academy, Inc. v. Employment Division, 298 Or 471, 695 P.2d 25 (1985). Analyzed whether freedom of religion guarantees of Oregon Constitution barred assessment of unemployment taxes on religious schools. Planned Parenthood Ass’n, Inc. v. Dept of Human Resources, 297 Or 562, 687 P.2d 785 (1984). Assessed whether Equal Privileges and Immunities Clause of Oregon Constitution, article 1, section 20, barred administrative rule limiting reimbursement for abortions Bono v. SAIF, 298 Or 405, 692 P2d 606 (1984). As Solicitor General reasserted Attorney General’s prerogative to represent State Accident Insurance Fund and to defend against claim for interim compensation by person not absent from work. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, 292 Or 266, 639 P.2d 90 (1981). Defended Public Employees Collective Bargaining Act against constitutional challenge under municipal Home Rule provisions of the Oregon Constitution. Matter of Jensen, 54 Or. App. 1, 633 P.2d 1302 (1981). Secured a life saving operation for a child over the religiously based objections of her parents on expedited appellate schedule from trial though the Court of Appeals to denial of review by the Oregon Supreme Court. Friend of the Court Briefs Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Ward, 470 US 869 (1985). Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. State of Oregon, 331Or 634, 20 P.3d 180 (2001). Amicus Curiae Brief for Oregon Outdoor Advertising Association to Oregon Supreme Court presented argument that commercial speech is protected from governmental regulation by Free Speech Clause of Oregon Constitution, article I, section 8 . Opinions of Oregon Attorney General Or. Op. Atty. Gen. OP-6300 (1990). Legislation Limited Liability Company (LLC) Legislation Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) Legislation General Counsel General Counsel: Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission General Counsel: Perennial Ryegrass Bargaining Association Special Appointments Prosecutor: State of Oregon v. Gortmaker, 1980 Prosecutor: State of Oregon v. Gustafson, 1999
|

